Followings are some of my suggestion to improve your CRF:
– Date format with first 3 letter of month (such as Apr, Jun) may be used to avoid confusing with DD/MM/YYYY or MM/DD/YYYY.
– Selection of study visit (screening, enrollment, follow-up, and unscheduled) can be replaced by 4 separate case-record form for each visit.
– The past medical history regarding endocrine/metabolic domain should be clarified to prevent confusing of their illness. History of influenza virus infection should address the onset within 6 months. Recall bias of participants can be occurred.
– Some parameter e.g., BMI can be calculated during the analysis in order to minimize workload on data entry.
– Grading of injection reaction appreciated me. The standard of the grading for mild, moderate, and severe should be found out.
Thanks for your insightful reply. Great minds do think alike, some of your comments are same as Arjan to improve my CRF.
1) I was trying to choose between EU formant and The Good Clinical and Data Management Practice (GCDMP) and settled on MM-DD-YYYY but you are absolutely right. I will use DD-MM-YYYY from now on.
2) Yes, I will try to be more clear about endocrine domain from now on
3) Yes, it is the same comments from Arjan as well, I will do that next time.
4) Thanks
Sincerely,
Zarni
Author
Posts
Viewing 3 reply threads
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login here