- This topic has 16 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 1 month, 3 weeks ago by
Alex Zayar Phyo Aung.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
2025-01-07 at 11:34 am #46455
Wirichada Pan-ngum
KeymasterWhat the good and bad of using EMR instead of the traditional paper based medical records in your setting? (10 Marks)
-
2025-01-27 at 4:42 pm #46710
Siriluk Dungdawadueng
ParticipantUsing Electronic Medical Records (EMR) instead of traditional paper-based medical records has several advantages and disadvantages. Here are some key points to consider:
Advantages of EMR
1) Improved Efficiency:
• Quick Access: EMRs allow for faster retrieval of patient information, reducing time spent searching for records.
• Streamlined Workflow: Digital records streamline administrative tasks, such as scheduling and billing.
2) Enhanced Patient Care:
• Comprehensive Data: EMRs provide a complete view of a patient’s medical history, aiding in better diagnosis and treatment.
• Decision Support: Built-in alerts for drug interactions, allergies, and other critical information improve patient safety.
3) Data Accuracy and Security:
• Reduced Errors: Eliminates issues related to illegible handwriting and transcription errors.
• Secure Storage: Digital records are less prone to physical damage and loss compared to paper records.
4) Improved Coordination:
• Information Sharing: Facilitates easier sharing of patient information among healthcare providers, improving coordination of care.
• Remote Access: Allows authorized personnel to access records remotely, which is beneficial for telemedicine and consultations.Disadvantages of EMR
1) Initial Costs and Maintenance:
• High Upfront Costs: Implementing an EMR system requires significant investment in software, hardware, and training.
• Ongoing Maintenance: Continuous updates, technical support, and system maintenance can be costly.
2) Training and Adaptation:
• Learning Curve: Staff may need extensive training to use the new system effectively, which can be time-consuming.
• Resistance to Change: Some healthcare providers may be resistant to transitioning from paper to digital records.
3) Technical Issues:
• System Downtime: Technical glitches or system failures can disrupt access to patient records.
• Interoperability: Ensuring compatibility with existing systems and other healthcare providers’ EMRs can be challenging.
4) Privacy and Security Concerns:
• Data Breaches: Digital records are vulnerable to cyberattacks and data breaches, which can compromise patient confidentiality.
• Compliance: Ensuring compliance with data protection regulations requires robust security measures.-
2025-02-01 at 9:21 pm #46823
Wannisa Wongkamchan
ParticipantThank you for sharing. I agree that EMR improves efficiency and patient care by making information easily accessible and reducing errors. However, technical issues and data security are big concerns. Hospitals need to balance the benefits with proper training and strong security measures to protect patient data.
-
-
2025-02-01 at 9:20 pm #46822
Wannisa Wongkamchan
ParticipantIn my setting, EMR has been used for over 10 years, and currently some inpatient wards also use CPOE (Computerized Physician Order Entry). From my experience, there are both advantages and disadvantages to replacing traditional paper-based medical records with EMR.
One of the biggest advantages is the reduction in paperwork. This helps decrease the need for physical document storage, making the hospital environment more organized. With fewer paper records, there is also a lower risk of document loss. Another important benefit is that hospitals can use the freed-up space for other medical services.
Moreover, EMR helps improve patient safety, can reduce medical errors by minimizes misinterpretations due to illegible handwriting. EMR also speeds up the process of managing and submitting medical billing claims. This improves hospital cash flow and reduces delays in reimbursement. Additionally, EMR makes it easier to review and ensure the quality of medical record documentation.
Another key advantage is improved accessibility and efficiency. Healthcare providers can quickly retrieve patient records from anywhere within the hospital system, leading to faster decision-making and better patient care. EMR also allows for integration with other health information systems, such as laboratory results, imaging, and prescriptions, which helps healthcare teams work together more effectively. It also makes it easier to use data for different purposes, such as creating reports, statistics report, and conducting research.
However, there are also disadvantages. Some staffs members were resistant to using EMR, making the transition difficult. Some departments still need to use both paper records and EMR, which creates extra work and makes document management more complicated. This hybrid system can cause inefficiencies in medical record audits.
Another issue is the performance of the computers used. If the system is slow or unreliable, it can affect the workflow of healthcare providers, leading to frustration and delays in patient care. Technical problems, such as system crashes or network downtime, can also disrupt hospital operations.
Additionally, while EMR enhances data accessibility, it also raises concerns about data security and privacy. Hospitals must invest in cybersecurity measures to protect sensitive patient information from unauthorized access, data breaches, or cyberattacks.
In conclusion
Overall, EMR offers many benefits, especially in reducing paperwork, improving efficiency, enhancing data accessibility, and improving patient safety. However, successful implementation requires staff cooperation, proper training, a reliable IT system, and strong data security.-
2025-02-10 at 5:53 am #46858
Wirichada Pan-ngum
KeymasterThanks for sharing the experiences, Wannisa. I am sure the EMR data system at Rajvithi is required for such a huge hospital. I sometimes wonder how much they use those data for research at Rajvithi, don’t have experience on research collaboration there.
-
-
2025-02-02 at 1:35 pm #46826
Alex Zayar Phyo Aung
ParticipantI led a study on the digital transformation of the Health Management Information System (HMIS) in Thai-Myanmar border areas. The primary objective was to assess the impact of digital HMIS initiatives on ethnic health systems amid the ongoing armed conflict along the Thailand-Myanmar border. I presented this study at the Health Systems Research Conference in Nagasaki, Japan, in 2024.
In our context, we face significant challenges in strengthening the health information system (HIS) in primary care settings due to limited resources such as internet access, IT infrastructure, and electricity. Therefore, our focus is on enhancing the electronic Health Information System (eHIS) at the cluster health center level rather than fully implementing electronic health records (EHR) at individual health service delivery points. Hence, I would like to share the following goods and area of improvement of using eHIS in conflict affected setting.Conclusion of the study: Using case-based digital HMIS is highly customizable, and interoperable, producing system-calculated indicators and headcount reports while maintaining the data quality. However, front-line health workers are burdened with recording individual patient information during active arm conflict settings.
Recommendation of the study: A digitalized Health Management Information System (HMIS) is essential for enhancing access to timely and accurate data, which is critical for effective health planning, management, and disease surveillance. However, based on the findings, the following key recommendations are suggested for its implementation in emergency context:
1) Aggregate Reporting: Aggregate reporting should be changed from case based recording to reduce the burden in health system
2) Interoperability: Promote interoperability between the health care digital sub system such as HMIS, HRIS and LMIS
3) Health Information Exchange: DRG and or ICD should be integrated into HMIS for enhancing health information exchange for disease classification, track morbidity, mortality and surveillance in the ethnic health system.https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uEAnNOZv-KmlOey0c45XyJU7IKDdyUWE/view?usp=sharing
-
2025-02-03 at 10:55 pm #46842
Cing Sian Dal
ParticipantYour discussion is insightful. I think that eHIS is an innovative and lightweight solution for the cluster level health center. I am curious to see what the Google Drive link is about.
-
2025-02-10 at 5:58 am #46859
Wirichada Pan-ngum
KeymasterHi Alex, the shared link is not accessible. Like Cing, I am also curious to read more about your work presented last year.
-
2025-02-10 at 6:50 pm #46868
Alex Zayar Phyo Aung
ParticipantThanks Aj, I made the link accessible for everyone.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uEAnNOZv-KmlOey0c45XyJU7IKDdyUWE/view?usp=sharing
-
-
-
2025-02-02 at 7:26 pm #46831
Aye Thinzar Oo
ParticipantEMR is considered potentially one of the drivers for the transformation of healthcare. From a patient care perspective, EMR is expected to improve the accuracy of the information, support clinical decision-making and improve the accessibility of information for continuity of care.
Using Electronic Medical Records (EMR) instead of traditional paper-based medical records has several advantages and disadvantages.
Advantages:
Improved accuracy: EMRs can enhance the accuracy of information, reduce errors associated with readability, and ensure that data is up-to-date.
Better accessibility: Health professionals can quickly access patient records, supporting quicker and more informed clinical decision-making.
Enhanced patient care: EMRs can streamline workflows, facilitate faster diagnoses, and improve the overall quality of care provided to patients.
Disadvantages:
Implementation costs: Transitioning to an EMR system can require significant financial investment and training for staff.
Dependence on technology: EMRs are subject to technical failures and require reliable infrastructure, which may not be available in all settings.
Privacy concerns: Electronic records can be more vulnerable to data breaches compared to physical records.
Training Requirements: Staff may require training to effectively use EMR systems, which can be time-consuming and costly.
Conclusion:
EMRs provide streamlined access to detailed patient information. Healthcare providers can view a patient’s complete history, including test results, diagnoses, treatments, and other relevant information, all with a few clicks. By reducing administrative paperwork and allowing more time for patient care. Electronic medical records pave the way toward a more efficient, accurate, and integrated approach to healthcare documentation.-
2025-02-02 at 11:47 pm #46832
Wannisa Wongkamchan
ParticipantImplementation costs and dependence on technology are important challenges when using EMR. The hospital needs a good budget plan and staff training to make sure the system works well. Also, hospitals must prepare backup plans for system failures, such as manual record-keeping or alternative IT support, to ensure patient care continues smoothly.
-
2025-02-03 at 9:27 pm #46837
Aye Thinzar Oo
ParticipantOf course, that you mention information needs to be planned as well. Thank you for your additional information. I need to think about it like you thought much about on deeply.
-
-
2025-02-03 at 10:49 pm #46841
Cing Sian Dal
ParticipantI agree that EMRs are the key drivers of healthcare. On the other hand, EMRs should be managed not to be easily accessible by everyone at healthcare provider. To prevent accessing patients’ data by senior officers or higher authorities of healthcare providers, it could be protected by implementing an Identity and Access Management policy either on-premise infrastructure or cloud or both.
-
-
2025-02-03 at 10:09 pm #46839
Tanaphum Wichaita
ParticipantWhat the good and bad of using EMR
Good of using EMR
The Efficiency – EMR improve patient data management. Unlike paper records, which require manual searching, EMRs allow instant access to patient history, lab results, and prescriptions. This speeds up decision-making and reduces administrative workload, ultimately improving patient care.
The Data Accuracy – Handwritten records are prone to errors, misinterpretation, and missing information. EMRs minimize these risks by ensuring clear, structured, and complete documentation. Standardized digital entries help avoid mistakes that could impact patient treatment.
The Remote Access – authorized healthcare providers can access patient data from multiple locations. This is especially useful in multi-clinic systems where doctors need to review a patient’s history even if they visited a different branch. Paper records, in contrast, are confined to a single location, limiting accessibility.
bad of using EMR
The Training Challenge – Transitioning from paper records to EMRs requires extensive training. Many healthcare workers, especially those unfamiliar with digital systems, may struggle with the new technology. Without proper training, efficiency can drop, and errors can increase during the adjustment period.
The Technical Issues – Unstable power supply, internet outages, or software failures can disrupt access to EMRs. In contrast, paper records are always available, regardless of technical issues. In settings with poor infrastructure, reliance on digital systems can pose a risk.
The Privacy Concern – While EMRs offer stronger security, they also introduce privacy risks. Digital records can be hacked or accessed by unauthorized users. In paper-based systems, physical access is required to view records, making data breaches less likely on a large scale.
-
2025-02-03 at 10:32 pm #46840
Cing Sian Dal
ParticipantI was a part of transforming from paper-based medical records to a digital system for underserved communities.
There were no engineering obstacles to digital transformation such as implementation, security and privacy, infrastructure, and resource requirements. However, there are major challenges in user perspectives.
_ Users enjoy writing records on paper more than data entry into the software system.
_ Users spend more time on digital data entry than paper-based recording for a single record.
These two facts remain valid after two years of use.
On the bright side, there are many benefits of using EMR in conflict-affected areas.
_ Data are protected against physical destruction of records.
_ Data are accessible anywhere anytime (stored on the cloud).
_ Displaced patients can access their records at different health facilities.
_ Healthcare providers/donors can review aggregated accurate data summary
_ Assist in disease surveillance and investigation
_ Assist in effective management and provisioning of vaccines and medicine
While offering many benefits, two key disadvantages mentioned above present a significant risk of a domino effect, impacting all aspects of the situation. No data flow, no users – the software is essentially dead.
-
2025-02-10 at 6:04 am #46860
Wirichada Pan-ngum
KeymasterThanks Cing for sharing insights from your work in the transformation. It is interesting that people prefer writing down and take longer for digital data entry. I guess it takes time to change and to accept those changes completely. Consistent training will also be important for the staff I am sure.
-
-
2025-02-10 at 6:06 am #46861
Wirichada Pan-ngum
KeymasterI noticed there are several responses to this discussion topic (and other topics too) in the form of summary. It is ok to do so but please make sure you add your own experiences and opinions to this as well, please.
-
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login here