Wow! I was amazed by your thorough CRF, Nichcha! You’ve shown your expertise and experience in clinical data management. I feel proud to review your CRF.
Your study ID naming system is awesome, and the skip logic and branching questions are also brilliant. In a constructive way, I’d like to suggest you include the current status of the underlying disease (if yes, in 6d). If I were the guy responsible for data entry, numbers in the parentheses would confuse me a bit. I understand these numbers are essential for coding later in the data analysis step. But for the data entry guy, all they have to do is fill in the exact information in the relevant data field, right? The last thing is to include questions about the known allergy of the participant (yes/no/don’t know) and specify the type of allergy in screening or enrollment.
It’s such an honor to learn from you.