- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 7 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
-
Your CRF is very concise and throughout. By providing a coding number in each box, the data manager and researcher can fill in eCRF in the system intuitively. Also, you divided each section for easier reading.
I would like to give some suggestions in the following aspect.
1. If the study is conducted in Thailand, we should clarify the year’s format since we use both BE (Buddhist Era) and CE (Common Era in gregorian calendar)
2. In the eligibility check, when the participant is not eligible for the study, there should be a comment section after No box.
3. The vaccination arms should write in the full name and in bold type to reduce clerical error: QIV -> Quadrivalent inactivated Influenza vaccine (QIV), TIV -> Trivalent inactivated Influenza vaccine (TIV)
4. For laboratory results, the titer always begins with 1 such as A/H1N1 Antibody titer 1: _______ etc.
5. There should be personnel initial fields in each session to explain who performs a physical exam, laboratory test, or fill in the form. And the initial must correlate with the study delegation log.Overall, your CRF is impressive. Keep Up the Good work!
-
-
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login here