- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 7 months ago by .
Viewing 1 reply thread
Viewing 1 reply thread
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login here
Home › Forums › TMHG 550 Data Management 2020 › Week 2 : peer review CRF assignment › CRF (Khaing Zin Zin Htwe) Reviewer Saravalee
Thank you Khaing Zin Zin Htwe for your great CRF. It cover all of the variables that need in the study. Your design in this CRF is easy to read, fill in, and follow the form. I very impress about the choices that often have the third option excluded from “Yes ” and “No” answer such as “unknow”, “Not done”, and “No examined”. These could be one of the measure to increase data validity and I forgot it in my CRF.
I have some suggestion for improving you CRF. First, base on my knowledge and my experience, any titer of antibody doesn’t has unit because it report in form of dilution (1:2 , 1:4 , 1:8 etc.). Thus, the unit column in laboratory data is redundancy. Second, because this study plan to study and collect data in Thailand, the units of weight and high that often use are kilograms in weight and centimeters in high. If the CRF form specify to fill in these data in inch and Ib unit, might difficult for collector to change the unit and increase their work.
Thank you for your hard work. If you have any opinion to discussion please let me know.
Dear Sara, thank you for your feedback on both good and weak points of my CRF design. It is very informative, and I would be able to avoid similar mistakes in the future.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login here