- This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 7 months ago by .
Viewing 3 reply threads
Viewing 3 reply threads
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login here
Home › Forums › TMHG 550 Data Management 2022 › Week 2 : peer review CRF assignment › CRF (Zarni) Reviewer Preut
CRF (Zarni) Reviewer Preut
https://mu-informatics.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/TMHG550_Wk2_ZARNI.pdf
Arjan do we need to put up our CRF here on our own? I was waiting to review my assign CRF but it is sill not available.
Followings are some of my suggestion to improve your CRF:
– Date format with first 3 letter of month (such as Apr, Jun) may be used to avoid confusing with DD/MM/YYYY or MM/DD/YYYY.
– Selection of study visit (screening, enrollment, follow-up, and unscheduled) can be replaced by 4 separate case-record form for each visit.
– The past medical history regarding endocrine/metabolic domain should be clarified to prevent confusing of their illness. History of influenza virus infection should address the onset within 6 months. Recall bias of participants can be occurred.
– Some parameter e.g., BMI can be calculated during the analysis in order to minimize workload on data entry.
– Grading of injection reaction appreciated me. The standard of the grading for mild, moderate, and severe should be found out.
Well done,
Thank you.
Dear Preut,
Thanks for your insightful reply. Great minds do think alike, some of your comments are same as Arjan to improve my CRF.
1) I was trying to choose between EU formant and The Good Clinical and Data Management Practice (GCDMP) and settled on MM-DD-YYYY but you are absolutely right. I will use DD-MM-YYYY from now on.
2) Yes, I will try to be more clear about endocrine domain from now on
3) Yes, it is the same comments from Arjan as well, I will do that next time.
4) Thanks
Sincerely,
Zarni
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login here