- This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 7 months ago by Boonyarat Kanjanapongporn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
2023-04-30 at 8:58 am #40122SaranathKeymaster
CRF (Wichayapat) Reviewer Boonyarat
https://mu-informatics.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/TMHG550_Wk2_Wichayapat_Thongrattana.pdf
-
2023-05-18 at 11:24 am #40595Boonyarat KanjanapongpornParticipant
Thank you for sharing, in my opinion your CRF is well managed and designed for users. Most questions are in closed-ended format and open-ended questions are convenient to fill out with unit preference. I do like the idea of pre-vaccination and follow up check box in the laboratory test section because we can reuse this form again.
As an amateur on CRF design, I have a few comments on the section, which took some time for me to understand the type of necessary answer and I felt unsure about the purpose of the question.
In the post vaccination reaction section, it could be that there are a few reactions occurring with different severity. I would suggest to have checkboxes for general, post vaccination reaction such as swelling, pain and redness. This would help to guide the data collector, reduce hand writing errors and provide enough space to record details for any reactions which occurred.
As same as Stage in chronic illness status, checkboxes for the status such as current and resolved can be prepared.
Lastly, there are a few questions mentioning illness status which probably create redundancy and confusion on the preference answer. Chronic illness in the screening form, Medical conditions and Chronic medical condition in the medical history and physical examination have some repeated questions which possibly can be merged to reduce the time spent on CRF. My idea is to have one chronic medical condition section, and the medical condition (current and not chronic) could be notified in the physical examination part.
Thank you.-
2023-05-19 at 1:54 pm #40605Wichayapat ThongrattanaParticipant
I agree with you that there is a lot of space for improvement in several sections of my CRF. It is a good suggestion to put the check box on post-vaccination reaction. For chronic illness, in my opinion, if the disease is already resolved, then it should not be assigned in the first place. For the redundancy suggestion on chronic illness and medical condition, since both are induced in different CRF which are used for different purposes. While the chronic illnesses section intends to gather only chronic disease tends to affect the result of screening, the medical information on enrollment contains much more information on all diseases, lesions, and disorders of that patient. I might redesign my medical condition section to gather information that is not related to what is already gathered.
-
2023-05-19 at 4:49 pm #40606Boonyarat KanjanapongpornParticipant
Thank you for the further explanation. I now understand the purpose of your design on different sections for personal illnesses. 🙂
-
-
-
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login here