- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 8 months ago by .
Viewing 1 reply thread
Viewing 1 reply thread
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login here
Home › Forums › TMHG 550 Data Management 2022 › Week 2 : peer review CRF assignment › CRF (Hazem) Reviewer Jintana
CRF (Hazem) Reviewer Jintana
https://mu-informatics.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/TMHG550_Wk2_Hazem-Abouelfetouh.pdf
Please provide suggestions to improve your friend’s CRF.
According to screening visit, This CRF is different from I ever see that your CRF consist of only inculsion and exclusion citerials. Actually, this visit have to contain general data which will be further retrieved by the author. For example, Age and gender. Additionally, “_ _/_ _ _/ 20-_ _ (DD/MMM/YYYY)” which migh be not commonly used, but it sill work. In part of the enrollment, Date was lebel as (DD/MMM/Y) that not correct. For the female who not only give information about precnancy which should be separated from gender section. However, This CRF was well done in part of vacination test. So, I suggest that you have to observe other CRF to improve the part of screening or others.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login here