- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 3 weeks ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
In case that your friend haven’t submitted the CRF on time, you can choose to review one of other friends’ CRF.
-
Very neat and practically clear design which is very friendly with data collector, especially in wide tick box.
In my opinion, I would remove weight in collecting demographic data, which I assume that it cannot be associated with the study.
Physical examination is well categorized including a detail section to provide its abnormal codes.
I am not sure what collected sample type means. If there is ID in the specimen or lab result, we can also add it.
More detail information about administrated vaccine can be added such as site of administration, route of administration, lot no, which would help in tracing back in finding out in manufacturing fault and adverse events.
-
Hello Cing, thank you for your detailed suggestion. Yes, I agree with you that weight is not directly associated with the study. For the vaccine, I think adding site and lot number would be beneficial as well, but I believe route is the same for all vaccine in this study (Intra-mascularly). For the sample type, yes, it is quite confusing in my case report form.
-
-
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login here