1. Is there any similar electronic-based clinical decision support system which has been developed or planned to be developed for NCD patients in remote area of your country? Please share your experience about advantages and disadvantages of the tool.
In Thailand, various electronic-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) that support non-communicable diseases (NCD) have been developed and deployed. These systems typically involve features that mainly facilitate healthcare workers in managing patient data and basic data visualization. The primary advantage of these systems is the simplified healthcare work and data management process in remote areas where manpower and support are limited. However, these systems also face challenges, including technical issues such as internet connection, training for healthcare workers, and concerns about data security.
2. Do you think that nurse or community health worker facilitated NCD management tool is the best option to compensate the shortage of healthcare workers in managing NCDs in the remote area? Are there any alternative options to address insufficient healthcare workers and promote the quality of care to NCD patients?
In my opinion, clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are effective in addressing the shortage of healthcare workers in remote areas of Thailand. These tools enable nurses and healthcare staff to manage NCD cases, reducing the reliance on doctors and improving care access. However, training is required for healthcare staff to use these CDSS tools effectively. Additionally, alternatives like telemedicine for remote consultation can also help address manpower shortages and enhance care quality for NCD patients in remote areas.