![User Avatar](https://mu-informatics.org/wp-content/uploads/learn-press-profile/387/400f129d4c459c5ea205411764edd5e5.jpeg)
Your CRF is impressive and well-organized! Thank you for Panyada’s feedback on the CRF. I also agree with your points. Here are some suggestions:
1. CRF Version and Date
Including the CRF version and date is indeed a valuable addition to ensure proper tracking and version control. By clearly indicating the version and date on the CRF, you can help maintain consistency across sites and ensure that all involved parties are working with the most up-to-date version. This practice is essential for maintaining data integrity and streamlining the data collection process.
2. Instructions Section
I am very impressed with the instruction section (that I did not have in my assignment haha). The inclusion of an instructions section in a CRF is a beneficial feature that can provide clarity and guidance to users completing the form. This section can help ensure that all users understand how to accurately fill out the CRF, reducing errors and improving data quality. Including detailed instructions can also help standardize data collection practices across different sites or users.
3. Use of ‘You’ vs. ‘Subject’
I am not quite sure that we should use ‘you’ or ‘subject’ in a CRF intended for investigators. It is important to consider the perspective and clarity of the instructions. Using ‘you’ can create a more direct and user-friendly tone, which may enhance comprehension and engagement with the form. However, it is essential to ensure that the language used is appropriate for the context and audience of the CRF. Ultimately, the choice between ‘you’ and ‘subject’ should be based on what best suits the specific requirements and user experience of the CRF.